And one of the major purposes of your education here is to progress in that manner. Thus it is both important and possible for us to be able to discern, apply, and internalize truth, despite the fact that we may be living in a post-truth world.
Byu video shorts selmie full#
To give us hope that we can eventually realize this almost incomprehensible goal of being full of truth, the scriptures make clear that Christ “received not of the fulness at first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness.” 14
Byu video shorts selmie free#
Indeed, He has internalized truth so well that He rightly proclaimed that He is “the truth.” 10 He further declared that if we come to know the truth in its fullest sense, the truth will make us free 11-free to realize our full potential as sons and daughters of God and “joint-heirs with Christ.” 12 One of our hymns thus correctly asserts that truth is “the brightest prize To which mortals or Gods can aspire.” 13 9 His knowledge of all truth and His adherence to those principles gives Him all power. Scriptures reveal that one of the defining characteristics of Christ-and one source of His supreme power-is that He is full of truth. In fact, a major part of our purpose in this mortal existence is to enhance and refine our ability to discern, apply, and ultimately internalize truth. A major part of your purpose here at BYU is to enhance your knowledge of the truth and your ability to discern it. My message to you today is that truth does exist, it does matter, and it can be discerned. While there are many causes for political polarization and crises of faith, one common feature is that they are often a partial result of living in a post-truth world in which truth seems so difficult to discern that many may wonder whether it is worth the effort-or even possible at all. These individuals, to use the words of the apostle Paul, are “tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men.” 8 This tendency sometimes manifests itself as a crisis of faith-triggered by the receipt of pieces of information, true or not, that do not coincide with previously held views. Others go to the opposite extreme, finding any piece of information that disrupts their prior views as sufficient reason to throw aside, without further inquiry, truths that have provided sure guidance to them and others in the past. A manifestation of this is the increasing polarization in American politics.
Stuck in an echo chamber of their own making, they stunt their ability to learn truth by sealing themselves off from any meaningful dialogue with any who may have different viewpoints. Some deal with the matter by looking for reinforcement of their own preexisting, and sometimes ill-informed, notions, limiting their pursuit of truth to only those sources that support their views.
Byu video shorts selmie how to#
Many do not know how to determine the accuracy or the truthfulness of new information. Living in a post-truth world in which there is more information available than there is time to process it presents particular challenges. Modernizing the plight of the thirsty Ancient Mariner, who proclaimed, “Water, water, everywhere, Nor any drop to drink,” 5 many today lament, “Data, data, everywhere, and not a thought to think.” 6 But it is clear that because we live in a digital age, in which there is so much information and there are so many different contending views of what is accurate, some people find that new information confounds and confuses rather than clarifies and enlightens. It is hard to know with certainty whether truth is really less important than it has been in the past. I wouldn’t be surprised if post-truth becomes one of the defining words of our time.” 3 Reflecting this view, several commentators have recently asserted that we live in a post-truth world, or a world in which truth “has become unimportant or irrelevant.” 4 denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” 2 Casper Grathwohl, president of Oxford Dictionaries, explained the selection: “Fuelled by the rise of social media as a news source and a growing distrust of facts offered up by the establishment, post-truth as a concept has been finding its linguistic footing for some time. . . Recently, Oxford Dictionaries announced that the word of the year for 2016 is post-truth, a word they define as “an adjective. In 2015 the word of the year was not a word but a pictograph: the “face with tears of joy” emoji. of that particular year and to have lasting potential as a word of cultural significance.” Past selections include unfriend in 2009 and selfie in 2013.
Each year Oxford Dictionaries selects a word of the year-“a word, or expression, that.
0 kommentar(er)
